Concrete Proof In Another ‘Scientific’ Paper That The Covid Outbreak Took Place In A Seafood Market 😉 More Event 201, Fauci & BMGF Connections…
Since the beginning of the Covid “pandemic” in 2020 the question everyone has been asking is
Where did the pandemic begin ?
Was it from nature or a lab ?
Dr Angela Rasmussen apparently has the answer. In a thread that has been retweeted over 5,700 times the answer is definitive.
It came from the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan.
So for all you “Doubting Thomas’s” who believe it was a lab leak I hate to disappoint you. You can put your mind to rest 😉
It’s time to go down the rabbit hole. In an extremely comprehensive thread
written on 26 July 2022 Dr Rasmussen points us to a paper in Science called
The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan was the early epicentre of the Covid-19 pandemic
Within the tweet Dr Rasmussen mentions 2 collaborators on the paper.
Professor Michael Worobey and Kristian Andersen. Within the thread (and this is important) Dr Rasmussen also says Worobey and Andersen have no financial or political agenda and that an independent, evidence-based investigation was needed. She also said “We are independent” and “we follow the evidence where it leads”.
I am not going to question their findings in the paper as I am not eminently qualified to do that. What I am going to do though is look at the funding they receive or the institutions that they work for receive. It is pretty telling.
Dr Rasmussen works for the University of Saskatchewan who have received funding of $4.6m from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) in the area of Global Health.
Professor Michael Worobey works at the University Of Arizona who have received funding in excess of $5m from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) in the area of Global Health as well as Novel Biotech Platform Capabilities.
The most interesting character of all is Kristian Andersen. After the alleged Covid outbreak from late 2019/2020 Anderson appeared on redacted emails including Daszak, Fauci and Farrar.
In Feb 2020 within days of saying he was concerned about certain properties that raised concern regarding a lab leak, Kristian Andersen said anyone who was concerned regarding a lab leak was a conspiracy theorist.
In a brilliant thread from July 2021 which exposes the whole shenanigans Sherri Markson writes
He also told Fauci that SARS-CoV-2 has “unusual features” that “potentially look engineered”.
Not long after this email, the scientists authored a piece insisting the virus was natural and Fauci said the same publicly. This is a massive cover-up.
Kristian Andersen also has his own lab named after him at Scripps Research Institute
The Scripps Research Institute has received funding in excess of $300 million from BMGF
It also has quite a few World Economic Forum members.
Rasmussen in her thread also writes of a companion paper called
The molecular epidemiology of multiple zoonotic origins of SARS-COV-2
which appeared in Science on the same day. Jonathan Pekar who was the co-author of this paper also works at UCSD which has received funding in excess of €50 million from BMGF.
In the final piece of the jigsaw, Rassmussen references another paper in her thread by Professor George Gao called
Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in the environment and animal samples of the Huanan Seafood Market
Gao coincidentally appeared at Event 201. Yes, that’s the same Event 201 that happened in October 2019 a few months before the Covid outbreak. Just another minor coincidence.
And I'm not even done with this thread and already the bad faith takes are rolling in from people with a vested interest in a lab origin, like this below.
Our article makes it 100% clear the pandemic originated at Huanan market. We present the evidence & it passed peer-review.
Well there we go, it’s definitive if Rasmussen says so as it passed peer-review. Because peer-review counts for anything nowadays.
Back in 2016 an article appeared on the WEF site called
Can we really trust scientists ?
That decision is up to you…..
PS. This Rasmussen 🧵 received 5.7k retweets. I can never hope to get that many for this article but if you do want others to know the “conflicts of interest” don’t be afraid to retweet it out 😉 Many Thanks.