Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Lyons's avatar

I don't think you're too far off the mark, frankly...

I live in Italy and I am told that Italy has one of the highest rates of per capita personal savings in Europe and possibly further afield. Italians also have a very high per capita rate of home ownership, much of it, as a high percentage of is old, is unencumbered. This is not a good scenario for bank earnings and is ripe for the plundering.

Larry Fink of Blackrock and his WEF chums have talked about how to "persuade" people out of home (and car) ownership. Now, I don't imagine they'll be coming around for tea and buns by the fire to have a chat about this "persuasion". The ideas floating here are to impose a minimum energy efficiency level on every home (incalculable millions to be earned by the construction sector) funded, where owners cannot finance it themselves, by the banks via government brokerage. Upon demise, the debt is settled by the sale of the house, leaving little or nothing to pass on and eliminating the possibility of any individuals growing some (very modest) wealth.

An alternative is to simply arrange a property tax rated against the energy rating if the home. In the end people will no longer be able to pay and will be forced to sell out.

Leo Varadkar said, did he not, that nobody will be forced of their homes by the government in Ireland for being unable to meet specific energy/emission requirements. No, but they will (could) be manoeuvred out by the banks on the back of financing requirements.

Blackrock are interestedi n nothing except growing their asset portfolio. I see it reported that already they are party to widespread buying of single family homes across America, frequently paying as much as 10% over the ask, thus pushing out individuals and reducing them to a lifetime of renting. There is growing evidence of the practice in Ireland, too.

As for the banks in general, we need only think back to 2007 to get a clear picture of where they stand on anything.

Go mberimid beo ar an t-am seo arís!

Expand full comment
Truth seeker's avatar

I’ve been telling friends for a long time that this is the end goal for us. Not for the so called ‘elite’ who will be exempt from this scheme and able to eat what they want when they want.

They are already doing this for other areas so their lifestyle doesn’t change.

The EU has exempted private yachts and jets from the carbon tax.

This paper is a response to the policy on exempting yachts:

https://www.transportenvironment.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Climate_Impacts_of_Shipping_Exemptions_Report-1.pdf

Look at the following paper (for those who don’t have time page 6 chart).

It is enshrined into U.K. law for 2050.

https://iceagefarmer.com/docs/AbsoluteZero.pdf

Now connect the dots…

Pushing the ‘vaccine’ despite deaths and serious injuries.

In the 1970s swine flu vaccine was stopped after 25-50 deaths.

The end goal is the vaccine passport linked with your digital ID combined with digital money and a carbon quota.

Why the animosity towards Russia and China?

Because they need all counties to come on board with this. If not then the world divides

Into 2 camps. One set with a broken economic system and an impoverished people monitored 24/7 and the other side, led by the commodities rich countries, with more liberties and richer.

Schwab has said Marxism didn’t work before because some countries didn’t embrace it.

Why do they have to get rich of Trump - stop him from the 2024 elections? Because he doesn’t agree with the above plans and would stop them.

Expand full comment
41 more comments...

No posts