Have You Any Idea How Your Carbon Footprint π£ And Your Carbon Wallet Are Really Going To Work In This Dystopian World The WEF Have Planned ?
Let me introduce you to Barbara Baarsma. Barbara is the CEO of Rabo Carbon Bank. Yes, you read that right. Not Rabo Bank but Rabo Carbon Bank. In this 53 second video interview below she is advocating for a "Personal Carbon Wallet". That may not seem like a big deal but when you hear what she has to say you should be concerned, very concerned in fact.
Iβve transcribed the interview as it is in Dutch. It contains critical information. If you prefer to watch the video with subtitles by all means please do so.
βLetβs ensure that every household or every citizen of the Netherlands receives a certain amount of carbon emission rights. This way we can ensure that we do not emit more than our yearly limit. Your emission rights will be stored in a carbon wallet. So if I wanted to fly, I would buy some carbon emission rights from someone who canβt afford to fly. For example this way this poor person can earn some extra money.
Or if someone lives in a small house, he can sell his emission rights to someone who lives in a big house, this way poor people can benefit from the green economyβ
Wow. Quite something isnβt it. Letβs pick it apart and then look at how they are probably going to implement it.
You could argue that itβs just another level of taxation which the globalistsΒ will take. I think it runs far deeper. When Bankers start using expressions like rights, poor people and green economy you can be sure that they are envisaging a world for the elite. They donβt give a fig about anyone else.
So in its most basic form, you'll have no fun and wonβt be allowed to travel anywhere. But donβt worry the elites will have the fun for you.
This is nothing more than Totalitarianism.
Did I forget to mention that Rabobank and Baarsma are both in the World Economic Forum.
https://www.weforum.org/organizations/rabobank-group
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/authors/barbara-baarsma
When most people think of carbon emissions and carbon footprints they think it only refers to travel, fuel, gas and electricity all under the guise of emissions. I hate to break it to you but it runs far deeper than that.
Let me now introduce you to Doc Ono, a company you may never have heard of.
Doconomy is a βcredit cardβ endorsed by Klaus Schwabβs World Economic Forum.
In May 2019 an article appeared on the WEF site called
βThis credit card has a carbon-emission spending limitβ
In the article it says
βSwedish fintech company Doconomy has launched a new credit card that monitors the carbon footprint of its customers - and cuts off their spending when they hit their carbon maxβ
Yikes, cuts off their spending.
It continues
βThe DO card tracks the CO2 emissions linked to purchases to calculate the carbon impact of every transaction. The aim is to encourage people to actively reduce their carbon footprint and demonstrate the impact that small changes can have on the environment.
The card uses the Aland Index as the basis on which it calculates the carbon footprint of each product purchased. Users can set a maximum value for their carbon spend and learn how to compensate for their carbon footprint by contributing towards schemes to reduce or remove greenhouse gas emissionsβ
Now we are getting closer to the truth of how this is going to operate. It isnβt just travel, it will be for everything.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/05/this-credit-card-has-a-carbon-emission-spending-limit/
In February 2019 Mastercard published an article called
Mastercard and Doconomy Launch the Future of Sustainable Payments
where they say
βDoconomy and Mastercard announce their joint effort to combat climate change by enabling DO β a free and easy-to-use mobile banking service that lets users track, understand and reduce their CO2 footprints through carbon offsettingβ
Isnβt it fascinating that they emphasise it will allow the users to track everything. It would never be used for nefarious purposes such as banks and governments tracking everything. Of course not π
Mastercard is also a WEF partner.
https://www.weforum.org/organizations/mastercard
The United Nations also got on board in May 2019. They published an article called
Innovative Climate Action β New Credit Card Limits Climate Impact of Users
https://unfccc.int/news/innovative-climate-action-new-credit-card-limits-climate-impact-of-users
Patrica Espinosa, the UN Climate Change Executive Secretary couldnβt get enough of the concept, singing its praises.
And yes, you guessed it, Espinosa and UN are also WEF partners. We are beginning to see a trend here yet again, arenβt we.
https://www.weforum.org/people/patricia-espinosa-cantellano
https://www.weforum.org/organizations/united-nations
The big banks also see this as a massive opportunity. In 2021 Barclays hopped into bed with MasterCard and Doconomy.
Seems like full on surveillance and socialism to me. And you probably donβt need me to tell you by this stage that Barclays is also a WEF member.
https://www.weforum.org/organizations/barclays
But thatβs not even close to what the WEF, Mastercard, UN and all these globalist bodies have planned. You are only being told a fraction of the story.
Let me paint you a picture of how this might play out. In Ireland, back in March of this year, Marc Γ Cathasaigh who is a Green Party TD (MP) paid a visit to a pub called Brew Dog in Dublin. He showed an image of the menu which had CO2 (carbon dioxide) labelling beside every food item on the menu and asked the question
Would this influence what you would order?
On the left side of the menu is your standard chicken, beef, lamb etc whilst on the right is your βplant-basedβ food including the lab processed βBeyond Meatβ. Bill Gates is also an investor in βBeyond Meatβ
There isnβt much difference in the outrageous Dublin prices between the two food types. There is however a massive difference in the CO2 levels.
The other point which is important to mention is that a seed is being planted in peopleβs minds about the different CO2 levels. They are trying to influence people into the hands of plant based foods and Beyond Meats. There is no doubt about it that there is an agenda at play.
I have no idea what the criteria was that they used for measuring the CO2 levels but the point is restaurants are beginning to trial this. I read all the comments below the thread with some saying it was a good idea and some said it wasnβt. The problem though was that everyone responding totally missed the point.
Here is what is probably going to happen. When you go out to a restaurant depending on what your βcarbon footprintβ has been, will determine what you can and cannot order off the menu.
Sounds ridiculous, doesnβt it ? Depending on how many points you have left for that month will determine whether you are allowed to eat βproper foodβ or βlab foodβ.
If youβve been a bold boy or girl youβll only be allowed to eat the lab grown plant-based food so you donβt surpass your carbon quota. If you try to order beef which apparently has high CO2 levels you wonβt be allowed to.
This will also be the case when you go to supermarkets to do your weekly shop. Every item you buy will be assigned a CO2 number.
It gets even more ridiculous though. Within the last month Eamonn Ryan who is a WEF member and leader of the Green Party in Ireland has advocated for the reduction in the numbers of Irish cattle. Instead we will import cattle from Brazil. I like to call this the work of the βRuminatiβ π If you know, you know.
How do you think the carbon footprint of importing beef from Brazil would look like on a menu now. It would be off the charts. Do you see what they are trying to achieve and where this is going ?
The whole thing sounds ridiculously Dystopian, doesnβt it ? That would never happen. Itβs so 1984, I hear you shout. If you have been paying attention to the last 2.5 years then you will realise itβs not remotely far-fetched at all.
We are being told how this is going to pan out. All you have to do is watch an episode of Black Mirror called Nosedive where the topic is social credit scores. Just substitute social credit score with carbon footprints and you will understand. Digital IDs and Currency, Social Credit Scores and Carbon Footprints will all work in tandem in the future.
I mentioned earlier Doc Ono. On their own site they give another example of how this would work for clothing. Letβs say you wanted to buy a pair of jeans π
On their web site they say
βConsumers could cut their carbon footprint in half by choosing lower impact productsβ
Imagine going shopping and having to whip out your βcarbon calculatorβ and realise you only have 10 points to play with. You wonβt be able to buy the 21.45 CO2 jeans, youβll have to plump for the 8.98 CO2 jeans. After all, you wonβt be allowed to go over your quota or your card will stop working and your digital payment will be declined.
I just mentioned a βcarbon calculatorβ. It just so happens that Mastercard have already developed it.
In a 2021 press release on their site they say
Mastercard unveils new Carbon Calculator tool for banks globally, as consumer passion for the environment grows.
Guess who they have collaborated with. Doconomy. Go Figure.
https://www.mastercard.com/news/press/2021/april/mastercard-unveils-new-carbon-calculator-tool/
This will be rolled out in the shape of an app so you can check your carbon footprint which will determine what you can and canβt buy.
https://www.2030calculator.com
But it isnβt just any old βcarbon calculatorβ itβs a 2030 carbon calculator, as in Agenda 2030. If you look closely enough at the top left hand corner of the image you can see the transition from 2020 to 2030.
It will eventually take the shape of an app that covers all the bases of Digital ID, Digital currency, social credit score etc. Basically a total control and surveillance grid which there will be no escape from. Welcome to Aldous Huxleyβs βBrave New Worldβ and George Orwellβs β1984β rolled into one.
Now whether this happens in reality or not is another story entirely. These are not the rantings of some mad, conspiracy theorist. Iβve tried to provide proof of what is going on in the real world. Itβs up to you whether you want to believe it or not and whether we let it happenβ¦.
I don't think you're too far off the mark, frankly...
I live in Italy and I am told that Italy has one of the highest rates of per capita personal savings in Europe and possibly further afield. Italians also have a very high per capita rate of home ownership, much of it, as a high percentage of is old, is unencumbered. This is not a good scenario for bank earnings and is ripe for the plundering.
Larry Fink of Blackrock and his WEF chums have talked about how to "persuade" people out of home (and car) ownership. Now, I don't imagine they'll be coming around for tea and buns by the fire to have a chat about this "persuasion". The ideas floating here are to impose a minimum energy efficiency level on every home (incalculable millions to be earned by the construction sector) funded, where owners cannot finance it themselves, by the banks via government brokerage. Upon demise, the debt is settled by the sale of the house, leaving little or nothing to pass on and eliminating the possibility of any individuals growing some (very modest) wealth.
An alternative is to simply arrange a property tax rated against the energy rating if the home. In the end people will no longer be able to pay and will be forced to sell out.
Leo Varadkar said, did he not, that nobody will be forced of their homes by the government in Ireland for being unable to meet specific energy/emission requirements. No, but they will (could) be manoeuvred out by the banks on the back of financing requirements.
Blackrock are interestedi n nothing except growing their asset portfolio. I see it reported that already they are party to widespread buying of single family homes across America, frequently paying as much as 10% over the ask, thus pushing out individuals and reducing them to a lifetime of renting. There is growing evidence of the practice in Ireland, too.
As for the banks in general, we need only think back to 2007 to get a clear picture of where they stand on anything.
Go mberimid beo ar an t-am seo arΓs!
Iβve been telling friends for a long time that this is the end goal for us. Not for the so called βeliteβ who will be exempt from this scheme and able to eat what they want when they want.
They are already doing this for other areas so their lifestyle doesnβt change.
The EU has exempted private yachts and jets from the carbon tax.
This paper is a response to the policy on exempting yachts:
https://www.transportenvironment.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Climate_Impacts_of_Shipping_Exemptions_Report-1.pdf
Look at the following paper (for those who donβt have time page 6 chart).
It is enshrined into U.K. law for 2050.
https://iceagefarmer.com/docs/AbsoluteZero.pdf
Now connect the dotsβ¦
Pushing the βvaccineβ despite deaths and serious injuries.
In the 1970s swine flu vaccine was stopped after 25-50 deaths.
The end goal is the vaccine passport linked with your digital ID combined with digital money and a carbon quota.
Why the animosity towards Russia and China?
Because they need all counties to come on board with this. If not then the world divides
Into 2 camps. One set with a broken economic system and an impoverished people monitored 24/7 and the other side, led by the commodities rich countries, with more liberties and richer.
Schwab has said Marxism didnβt work before because some countries didnβt embrace it.
Why do they have to get rich of Trump - stop him from the 2024 elections? Because he doesnβt agree with the above plans and would stop them.