Discussion about this post

User's avatar
B England's avatar

I absolutely agree with everything here. I believe the Truss appointment was known to be for a short caretaker time as the members would never have backed the guy who stabbed Boris, so they roll out Liz with the carrot of )£115K for life as a pay off, the banks colluded to short the £ so that there was a financial crisis, leaving a clear path for Sunak. Just look at her smirking during her 'resignation' speech - her face and body language was not that of a woman in any way concerned/sorry/anquished. I am raging. Sunak will take us into CBDC and it will be PROGRAMMABLE, people need to wake up! I detest these politicians and bankers - together their corruption has bankrupted us all but they will ensure their funds are intact.

Expand full comment
baboon's avatar

Great work as always. My guess was that WEF Truss would implement policies that, say, Reform or another populist party might run on - that's killed anyone doing that again deader than a hammer. The BoE will coup you faster than you can say "Nathaniel de Rothschild".

There is no reason why Sunak couldn't have won first time round. There is also no reason why Truss couldn't have run on the same policies that Sunak will use. These people are completely interchangeable. This was done for a very specific reason.

It's absolutely hilarious (in a dark humour way) that the lame duck Boris regime was bobbing along with no crisis of the magnitude that Truss "created". My General Theory of Current Year Politics these days is run on a manifesto of "do nothing". As in, literally do nothing. It would be massively popular in countries like France, Spain and Italy and now, it looks like, the UK too.

As for Boris running, what on Earth is that about? He literally just resigned. WTF?

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts