They describe themselves as “impartial” and having “no conflicts of interest” but are they really as impartial as they make out.
Superb!
I love the fact that Facebook had to admit in a US court case a couple of weeks ago that it's fact checks were only opinion and therefore protected speech under the First Ammendment, as a defamation defence. The case was Sossel v Meta (Facebook).
More detail in the video linked below.
https://youtu.be/URZTVfmuhJI
The creater of craiglist for example too, created his organisation and funds the “fact” checkers, while he himself is part of the WEF young globals.
Even gaming services as DIscord now follow the fact checkers and censor everything that goes against the narrative.
Superb!
I love the fact that Facebook had to admit in a US court case a couple of weeks ago that it's fact checks were only opinion and therefore protected speech under the First Ammendment, as a defamation defence. The case was Sossel v Meta (Facebook).
More detail in the video linked below.
https://youtu.be/URZTVfmuhJI
The creater of craiglist for example too, created his organisation and funds the “fact” checkers, while he himself is part of the WEF young globals.
Even gaming services as DIscord now follow the fact checkers and censor everything that goes against the narrative.